Back to Blog

API Gateway Comparison: AWS API Gateway vs Kong vs Nginx vs Traefik

Compare API gateways in 2026 — AWS API Gateway HTTP API vs REST API, Kong OSS vs enterprise, Nginx as gateway, Traefik for Kubernetes. Performance benchmarks, c

Viprasol Tech Team
13 min read
Updated 2026

API Gateway Comparison: AWS API Gateway vs Kong vs Nginx vs Traefik

Quick answer. An API gateway handles routing, auth, rate limiting, logging, and TLS for your APIs. AWS API Gateway fits all-in AWS and serverless; Kong is the most plugin-extensible; Nginx is fastest and simplest for self-hosted routing; Traefik is best for dynamic container-native (Kubernetes/Docker) setups. Pick by where you run and how much you want to manage.

An API gateway handles the cross-cutting concerns that every API needs: routing, authentication, rate limiting, logging, TLS termination, and request transformation. The question isn't whether to use one — it's which one fits your infrastructure and team.


Quick Decision Guide

ChooseWhen
AWS API Gateway (HTTP API)Serverless/Lambda backends; deep AWS integration; minimal ops overhead
Kong OSSComplex routing rules; custom plugin needs; self-hosted preference; Kubernetes
NginxHigh-performance reverse proxy; team already knows Nginx; simple routing
TraefikKubernetes-native; automatic service discovery; cert-manager integration
CaddySmall deployments; automatic HTTPS with zero config
AWS ALBECS/EKS on AWS; path-based routing without gateway overhead

AWS API Gateway

AWS offers two API Gateway products:

HTTP APIREST API
Latency~6ms overhead~11ms overhead
Price$1.00/million requests$3.50/million requests
FeaturesJWT auth, CORS, throttlingJWT + Cognito, WAF, request validation, usage plans
Best forLambda + simple routingComplex auth flows, API keys, WAF

HTTP API with JWT authorizer (Terraform):

# terraform/api-gateway.tf
resource "aws_apigatewayv2_api" "main" {
  name          = "api"
  protocol_type = "HTTP"

  cors_configuration {
    allow_origins = ["https://app.yourproduct.com"]
    allow_methods = ["GET", "POST", "PUT", "DELETE", "OPTIONS"]
    allow_headers = ["Content-Type", "Authorization"]
    max_age       = 86400
  }
}

resource "aws_apigatewayv2_authorizer" "jwt" {
  api_id           = aws_apigatewayv2_api.main.id
  authorizer_type  = "JWT"
  identity_sources = ["$request.header.Authorization"]
  name             = "jwt-authorizer"

  jwt_configuration {
    audience = ["https://api.yourproduct.com"]
    issuer   = "https://your-tenant.auth0.com/"
  }
}

resource "aws_apigatewayv2_integration" "backend" {
  api_id             = aws_apigatewayv2_api.main.id
  integration_type   = "HTTP_PROXY"
  integration_uri    = "http://${aws_lb.backend.dns_name}/{proxy}"
  integration_method = "ANY"
  payload_format_version = "1.0"
}

resource "aws_apigatewayv2_route" "protected" {
  api_id             = aws_apigatewayv2_api.main.id
  route_key          = "ANY /api/{proxy+}"
  authorization_type = "JWT"
  authorizer_id      = aws_apigatewayv2_authorizer.jwt.id
  target             = "integrations/${aws_apigatewayv2_integration.backend.id}"
}

resource "aws_apigatewayv2_stage" "default" {
  api_id      = aws_apigatewayv2_api.main.id
  name        = "$default"
  auto_deploy = true

  default_route_settings {
    throttling_burst_limit = 5000
    throttling_rate_limit  = 1000
  }
}

Cost reality check:

  • 100M requests/month: HTTP API = $100, REST API = $350
  • At low scale (< 10M req/month), cost difference is negligible
  • At high scale (> 1B req/month), consider self-hosted Kong or Nginx — much cheaper

☁️ Is Your Cloud Costing Too Much?

Most teams overspend 30–40% on cloud — wrong instance types, no reserved pricing, bloated storage. We audit, right-size, and automate your infrastructure.

  • AWS, GCP, Azure certified engineers
  • Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, CDK)
  • Docker, Kubernetes, GitHub Actions CI/CD
  • Typical audit recovers $500–$3,000/month in savings

Kong OSS

Kong is a Lua-based API gateway built on Nginx, extensible via plugins. Kong OSS is free; Kong Enterprise adds RBAC, dev portal, and analytics ($).

Docker Compose setup:

# docker-compose.yml
services:
  kong-db:
    image: postgres:16-alpine
    environment:
      POSTGRES_USER: kong
      POSTGRES_PASSWORD: kong
      POSTGRES_DB: kong
    volumes:
      - kong_db:/var/lib/postgresql/data

  kong-migrations:
    image: kong:3.7
    command: kong migrations bootstrap
    environment:
      KONG_DATABASE: postgres
      KONG_PG_HOST: kong-db
      KONG_PG_USER: kong
      KONG_PG_PASSWORD: kong
    depends_on: [kong-db]

  kong:
    image: kong:3.7
    environment:
      KONG_DATABASE: postgres
      KONG_PG_HOST: kong-db
      KONG_PG_USER: kong
      KONG_PG_PASSWORD: kong
      KONG_PROXY_LISTEN: 0.0.0.0:8000
      KONG_ADMIN_LISTEN: 0.0.0.0:8001
    ports:
      - "8000:8000"  # Proxy
      - "8001:8001"  # Admin API
    depends_on: [kong-migrations]

volumes:
  kong_db:

Configure a service, route, and plugins via Kong Admin API:

# Create a service (upstream)
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services \
  -d name=users-api \
  -d url=http://users-service:3001

# Create a route for the service
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/users-api/routes \
  -d "paths[]=/api/users" \
  -d "methods[]=GET" \
  -d "methods[]=POST"

# Add JWT auth plugin
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/users-api/plugins \
  -d name=jwt \
  -d "config.claims_to_verify=exp"

# Add rate limiting plugin
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/services/users-api/plugins \
  -d name=rate-limiting \
  -d "config.minute=1000" \
  -d "config.hour=10000" \
  -d "config.policy=redis" \
  -d "config.redis_host=redis"

# Add request logging plugin
curl -X POST http://localhost:8001/plugins \
  -d name=file-log \
  -d "config.path=/tmp/kong.log"

Kong declarative config (DB-less mode, good for Kubernetes):

# kong.yaml
_format_version: "3.0"

services:
  - name: users-api
    url: http://users-service:3001
    routes:
      - name: users-route
        paths: [/api/users]
    plugins:
      - name: jwt
        config:
          claims_to_verify: [exp]
      - name: rate-limiting
        config:
          minute: 1000
          policy: redis
          redis_host: redis
          redis_port: 6379

  - name: payments-api
    url: http://payments-service:3002
    routes:
      - name: payments-route
        paths: [/api/payments]
        methods: [POST]
    plugins:
      - name: jwt
      - name: request-size-limiting
        config:
          allowed_payload_size: 1  # 1MB max

Nginx as API Gateway

Nginx is not purpose-built as an API gateway, but it's extremely fast and widely understood. For teams with Nginx expertise, using it as a gateway avoids learning another tool.

# /etc/nginx/conf.d/api-gateway.conf
upstream users_service {
    server users-service:3001;
    keepalive 32;
}

upstream orders_service {
    server orders-service:3002;
    keepalive 32;
}

# Rate limiting zone: 10 req/s per IP
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_limit:10m rate=10r/s;

server {
    listen 80;
    server_name api.yourproduct.com;

    # JWT validation via auth subrequest
    location = /auth {
        internal;
        proxy_pass http://auth-service:3003/validate;
        proxy_pass_request_body off;
        proxy_set_header Content-Length "";
        proxy_set_header X-Original-URI $request_uri;
    }

    location /api/users {
        auth_request /auth;
        auth_request_set $auth_user_id $upstream_http_x_user_id;
        auth_request_set $auth_tenant_id $upstream_http_x_tenant_id;

        limit_req zone=api_limit burst=20 nodelay;

        proxy_pass http://users_service;
        proxy_set_header X-User-Id $auth_user_id;
        proxy_set_header X-Tenant-Id $auth_tenant_id;
        proxy_set_header Host $host;
        proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
        proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;

        # Timeouts
        proxy_connect_timeout 5s;
        proxy_read_timeout 30s;
        proxy_send_timeout 30s;
    }

    location /api/orders {
        auth_request /auth;
        limit_req zone=api_limit burst=20 nodelay;
        proxy_pass http://orders_service;
        proxy_set_header Host $host;
    }

    # Health check (no auth)
    location /health {
        return 200 '{"status":"ok"}';
        add_header Content-Type application/json;
    }
}

Nginx rate limiting granularity:

# Per-user rate limiting (requires user ID from JWT in a header)
map $http_x_user_id $rate_limit_key {
    default $binary_remote_addr;  # Fall back to IP if no user ID
    ~.+     $http_x_user_id;
}
limit_req_zone $rate_limit_key zone=per_user:50m rate=100r/m;

api-gateway - API Gateway Comparison: AWS API Gateway vs Kong vs Nginx vs Traefik

⚙️ DevOps Done Right — Zero Downtime, Full Automation

Ship faster without breaking things. We build CI/CD pipelines, monitoring stacks, and auto-scaling infrastructure that your team can actually maintain.

  • Staging + production environments with feature flags
  • Automated security scanning in the pipeline
  • Uptime monitoring + alerting + runbook automation
  • On-call support handover docs included

Traefik for Kubernetes

Traefik integrates natively with Kubernetes — it reads IngressRoute custom resources and automatically discovers services. No Nginx config files to maintain.

# k8s/ingress-route.yaml
apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1
kind: IngressRoute
metadata:
  name: api-routes
  namespace: production
spec:
  entryPoints: [websecure]
  routes:
    - match: Host(`api.yourproduct.com`) && PathPrefix(`/api/users`)
      kind: Rule
      middlewares:
        - name: jwt-auth
        - name: rate-limit
      services:
        - name: users-service
          port: 3001

    - match: Host(`api.yourproduct.com`) && PathPrefix(`/api/orders`)
      kind: Rule
      middlewares:
        - name: jwt-auth
        - name: rate-limit
      services:
        - name: orders-service
          port: 3002
  tls:
    certResolver: letsencrypt
# k8s/middlewares.yaml
apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1
kind: Middleware
metadata:
  name: rate-limit
spec:
  rateLimit:
    average: 100
    period: 1m
    burst: 50
---
apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1
kind: Middleware
metadata:
  name: jwt-auth
spec:
  forwardAuth:
    address: http://auth-service:3003/validate
    authResponseHeaders:
      - X-User-Id
      - X-Tenant-Id

Performance Comparison

Benchmarks (single-core, 100-byte response, ~2026 hardware):

GatewayRequests/secp99 LatencyNotes
Raw Nginx~80,0002msBaseline — no gateway logic
Traefik~55,0004msKubernetes-native, very close to Nginx
Kong (DB-less)~40,0006msLua overhead, plugin execution
AWS API GatewayN/A managed6–15msPer-request pricing, managed
Kong (DB mode)~35,0008msDB round-trip for config

In practice, backend latency (tens to hundreds of milliseconds) dominates. Gateway overhead rarely matters until you're handling > 10K req/s.


Cost Comparison (100M requests/month)

SolutionInfrastructureLicensingTotal/Month
AWS API Gateway HTTP$100$100
AWS API Gateway REST$350$350
Nginx (t3.small)$17$0$17
Kong OSS (t3.medium)$34$0$34
Traefik OSS (in EKS)Cluster cost$0Cluster-included
Kong Enterprise$34+$50,000+/yrEnterprise pricing

At high scale (> 1B requests/month), self-hosted Kong or Nginx is significantly cheaper than AWS API Gateway.


The Viprasol Method

We design and implement API gateway infrastructure — AWS API Gateway with Terraform, Kong in Kubernetes, Nginx reverse proxy configurations, and Traefik for Kubernetes-native routing. Gateway setup is foundational for any multi-service architecture.

Talk to our team about API infrastructure and microservices architecture.


Continue Learning

API Gateway Comparison: Choosing Between a REST API and Traefik in Practice

A useful API gateway comparison starts with what actually sits in front of your services. The "REST API vs Traefik" question is a common point of confusion, so it is worth clarifying: a REST API is the interface your application exposes, while Traefik is a reverse proxy and gateway that routes, secures, and load-balances traffic to those APIs. They solve different layers of the stack, not competing roles.

When weighing AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx, and Traefik, match the tool to your constraints. Traefik shines with dynamic service discovery in containerized environments. Kong adds a rich plugin ecosystem for auth and rate limiting. AWS API Gateway suits serverless and managed deployments. At Viprasol Tech, our senior engineers take full ownership of these decisions, benchmarking latency, observability, and operational cost before recommending an architecture.

api-gatewayawskongnginxtraefikinfrastructure
Share this article:

About the Author

V

Viprasol Tech Team

Custom Software Development Specialists

The Viprasol Tech team specialises in algorithmic trading software, AI agent systems, and SaaS development. With 1000+ projects delivered across MT4/MT5 EAs, fintech platforms, and production AI systems, the team brings deep technical experience to every engagement.

MT4/MT5 EA DevelopmentAI Agent SystemsSaaS DevelopmentAlgorithmic Trading

Need DevOps & Cloud Expertise?

Scale your infrastructure with confidence. AWS, GCP, Azure certified team.

Free consultation • No commitment • Response within 24 hours

Viprasol · Big Data & Analytics

Making sense of your data at scale?

Viprasol builds end-to-end big data analytics solutions — ETL pipelines, data warehouses on Snowflake or BigQuery, and self-service BI dashboards. One reliable source of truth for your entire organisation.